Journal article
Roberta Rosa Valtorta, Cristina Baldissarri, Chiara Volpato
Current Psychology, vol. 45, 2026, p. 884
Current Psychology, vol. 45, 2026, p. 884
View PDF
Data
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Valtorta, R. R., Baldissarri, C., & Volpato, C. (2026). Metaphors matter: The effect of biological dehumanizing language on indirect aggression. Current Psychology, 45, 884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-026-09290-4
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Valtorta, Roberta Rosa, Cristina Baldissarri, and Chiara Volpato. “Metaphors Matter: The Effect of Biological Dehumanizing Language on Indirect Aggression.” Current Psychology 45 (2026): 884.
MLA
Click to copy
Valtorta, Roberta Rosa, et al. “Metaphors Matter: The Effect of Biological Dehumanizing Language on Indirect Aggression.” Current Psychology, vol. 45, 2026, p. 884, doi:10.1007/s12144-026-09290-4.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{roberta2026a,
title = {Metaphors matter: The effect of biological dehumanizing language on indirect aggression},
year = {2026},
journal = {Current Psychology},
pages = {884},
volume = {45},
doi = {10.1007/s12144-026-09290-4},
author = {Valtorta, Roberta Rosa and Baldissarri, Cristina and Volpato, Chiara}
}
Abstract
Biologization – a form of dehumanization in which others are considered as disease carriers rather than humans – is common in the political debate; however, its effects have been understudied. To fill this gap, we conducted three pre-registered experimental studies in which biological language was manipulated through vignettes. We found that using disease metaphors (vs. negative but non-dehumanizing language) to describe others increased biologization, indirect (vs. direct) aggression, and exclusionary intentions. Study 1 (N = 201) provided initial evidence of these associations. Study 2 (N = 204) and Study 3 (N = 248) deepened these results, indicating that the effect of biological language on indirect aggression via biologization (Study 2) and accessibility of aggressive thoughts (Study 3) was bigger and significant for participants with high and medium (vs. low) levels of disgust sensitivity. This research highlights how framing groups as biological threats can intensify aggression and exclusion, shedding light on this dehumanizing rhetoric.